270276_not-searchable
/en/priser-og-prisindekser/statistikker/ppp/aar
270276
Norway fourth place in GDP comparison
statistikk
2016-12-14T08:00:00.000Z
Prices and price indices
en
ppp, Comparison of price levels in Europe, gross domestic growth, volume index, personal consumption, price level adjusted GDP, price level index, EU countries, EEA countries, international comparisonsConsumer prices , Prices and price indices
false
Statistics show price level-adjusted GDP per capita, actual individual consumption per capita and comparative price levels in Europe. Norway is fourth place in the price level-adjusted GDP per capita comparison.

Comparison of price levels in Europe2013-2015, preliminary figures

Content

Published:

This is an archived release.

Go to latest release

Norway fourth place in GDP comparison

Within Europe, Norway’s price level-adjusted Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita has consistently been second to Luxembourg since the late 90s. Eurostat’s results for 2015 showed that Ireland is now second, however Norway’s actual individual consumption remains high compared to EU average.

GDP and actual individual consumption per capita, price level adjusted. Relative price levels of actual individual consumption. Selected countries1
2015
Gross Domestic ProductActual individual consumptionActual individual consumption
Volume indices of real expenditure per capita (EU28=100)Volume indices of real expenditure per capita (EU28=100)Price level indices (EU28=100)
1Source: Eurostat
Norway160133149
Iceland123113132
Sweden124111131
Denmark127115136
Finland109114120
France106112103
Italy969999
Poland697451
Spain908892
United Kingdom108114134
Germany124123101

The latest results from the European Comparison Programme showed that Luxembourg, Ireland, Switzerland and Norway have the highest price level-adjusted GDP per capita in Europe. In 2015, the GDP per capita for the four countries ranged from 164 to 60 per cent above the average of the 28 EU countries (EU28). The rest of the countries in the comparison basically retained their relative positions from 2014 with some exceptions. The international guidelines for the national accounts have been updated with the European system of national and regional account (ESA 2010) and published figures in 2015 are based on revised figures. See link to website in Eurostat for details regarding PPP revisions. 

Norway and Ireland with largest relative changes from 2013-2015

Ireland bumped Norway out of second place in the GDP comparison. Ireland had the largest relative increase in price-level adjusted GDP per capita between 2013 and 2015, while Norway had the largest relative decrease in the same period. The change in ranking can be attributed to two factors. The Irish economy experienced a surge as significant foreign investments were recorded in 2015 due to its low corporate tax regime, and the establishment of multinational companies with high intellectual capital and a strong increase in leasing companies in air transport led to strong GDP growth. Norway on the other hand faced decreases in both the price and volume of its main export product, petroleum. 

The rest of Europe basically retained their relative positions with some exceptions. It should be noted that changes over time in the ranking of countries in the GDP comparison can either be attributed to changes in the nominal GDPs, changes in the price level indicators (PPPs), changes in the population, or a combination of these factors. Countries in East and Central Europe generally have lower levels of GDP per capita compared to western European countries. There was a noticeable relative increase in price level-adjusted GDP for Croatia from 2013 to 2015. 

Consumption levels highest in Luxembourg, Norway, Switzerland and Germany

Luxembourg, Norway, Switzerland and Germany lead the comparison of Actual Individual Consumption per capita in 2015, with 37, 33, 28 and 23 per cent above the average of the EU28 respectively. Actual individual consumption per capita for Norway is around 16-20 per cent higher than the other Nordic countries. The Balkan countries, with the exception of Greece, remain at the bottom of the list in the 2015 comparison. For Bosnia-Hercegovina, Albania, Macedonia and Serbia, consumption of goods and services is less than half the average for EU28. The consumption level for Montenegro, Bulgaria, Turkey, Romania, Hungary and Croatia is slightly higher, at around 40 to 50 per cent below EU28. 

Switzerland and Norway again are Europe’s most expensive countries in 2015

Switzerland and Norway were Europe’s most expensive countries in 2015, with price levels 72 and 49 per cent above the EU28 average respectively. Figure 2 shows the price levels for Actual Individual consumption in selected countries. If we compare Norway’s price level with its neighbours, it is 9 per cent above the level of Denmark and 14 per cent above the level of Sweden. Other countries with relatively high price levels are Denmark, Luxembourg, United Kingdom, Iceland and Sweden, with price levels from 31 to 36 per cent above EU28. 

The countries with the lowest relative price levels in the survey are situated in South Eastern Europe. In Macedonia, Albania and Bulgaria, the price levels of goods and services for actual individual consumption are slightly over a quarter of the level in Norway. Changes in the relative price levels over time can be attributed to different inflation rates in the countries. However, in many cases, the changes are due to changes in the countries’ exchange rate compared to the Euro. 

Actual individual consumption per capita and GDPOpen and readClose

While gross domestic product (GDP) per capita is often used as an estimate of the material prosperity of a country, “actual individual consumption per capita” may provide a more accurate picture of residents’ actual living standards, even if savings should also be considered in this matter.

PPP revisionsOpen and readClose

According to PPP regulation, generally published final PPPs shall generally not be revised. However general revisions have been carried out owing to changes to the concepts underlying ESA 95 that affect PPP results, the volume index of GDP for any Member State changes by more than one percentage point. The introduction of ESA 2010 had a significant impact on the level of GDP in many countries, thus the general revision of the PPP time series starting in 1995. The most important changes made were:

  • Collection of new basic heading level expenditure data according to ESA 2010.
  • Collection of new data on housing (actual rents and imputed rents).
  • Introduction of the output approach for education.
  • Use of prices for electricity and gas from Eurostat’s Energy. Statistics for the years 2007-2011.
  • Introduction of new method for health.