2119_not-searchable
/en/arbeid-og-lonn/statistikker/akumnd/arkiv
2119
Rising employment
statistikk
2006-05-31T10:00:00.000Z
Labour market and earnings;Labour market and earnings
en
akumnd, Labour force survey, seasonally-adjusted figures, LFS, labour market, employees, unemployed, economically active, man-weeks worked, labour forceUnemployment , Employment , Labour market and earnings
false

Labour force survey, seasonally-adjusted figuresMarch 2006

Content

Published:

This is an archived release.

Go to latest release

Rising employment

Employment increased by 17 000 people from December 2005 to March 2006. The figures presented in this article are adjusted for seasonal variations.

The increase in employment from December 2005 (the November-January period) to March 2006 (February-April) is outside the Labour Force Survey (LFS) error margin, and consistent with the development since the summer of 2005.

Unemployed (LFS), registered unemployed and registered unemployed plus government measures to promote employment. Seasonally adjusted figures, three-month moving average in 1 000. 1997-2006

Labour force, employees and man-weeks worked. Seasonally adjusted figures, three-month moving average in 1 000. 1997-2006

Unemployment in March 2006 was 6 000 lower than in December 2005. This is approximately on level with the LFS error margin, and consistent with the development since the summer of 2005. Seasonally adjusted figures of registered unemployment at job centres show a decline of 5 000 people from December 2005 to March 2006.

Unemployment down in Germany

The seasonally adjusted unemployment rate for Norway was 4.0 per cent in March 2006, compared with 4.3 per cent in December 2005. The rate in the EU15 area fell from 7.7 to 7.6 per cent, and in the OECD area from 6.4 to 6.2 per cent. In the same period, unemployment fell from 4.9 to 4.7 per cent in the USA. In Denmark, the rate increased from 4.0 to 4.3 per cent, while Finland had a decline from 8.2 to 7.9 per cent. From December to March, unemployment fell from 9.2 to 9.1 per cent in France, and from 9.5 to 8.7 per cent in Germany, according to figures from the OECD and Eurostat .

Employment (LFS). Seasonally adjusted figures and trend figures. Three-month moving average in 1 000. 1999-2006

Seasonally adjusted unemployment in selected countries. Percentage of the labour force. March 2006

From December 2005 to March 2006, man-weeks worked fell by 34 000, which is outside the LFS error margin. Still, the overall impression is that the man-weeks worked figures have been increasing since the beginning of 2004.

Changes in the LFS from 2006

With effect from January 2006, some improvements have been made in the Norwegian LFS. This will make the employment and unemployment figures more comparable with figures from the EU-countries. In addition, actual working hours will be measured more accurately. Therefore, the changes have lead to a level shift in the LFS figures. To maximize the comparability before/after 2006, the figures for the months in 2006 have been calculated according to the LFS prior to the changes.

Quarterly LFS figures, i.e. not seasonally adjusted, are presented in a separate article . The belonging tables contain figures for the first quarter of 2006, both according the LFS before and after the change. This will give an insight in the effects of the LFS changes on the various figures. For more details on the LFS, the seasonal adjustment method and the changes in the LFS, you can click on the links at the left side of this page.

Unemployment (LFS). Seasonally adjusted figures and trend figures. Three-month moving average in 1 000. 1999-2006

Uncertain figures

The purpose of making adjustments for seasonal variations is to describe the development over the last year and provide figures of change between the last two three-month periods, corrected for normal seasonal variations. In order to reduce uncertainty, the published series are three-month moving averages of the seasonally adjusted figures. For instance, the figures for March represent the average of the estimates for February, March and April.

Tables: