53378_not-searchable
/en/befolkning/statistikker/flytting/aar
53378
Much migration, but less centralisation
statistikk
2011-05-05T10:00:00.000Z
Population;Population;Immigration and immigrants
en
flytting, Migrations, migrations, in-migration, out-migration, net migration, net immigration, immigrations, emigrations, country of emigration, country of immigration, return migration, citizenshipMigration , Immigrants , Population, Population, Immigration and immigrants
false

Migrations2010

Content

Published:

This is an archived release.

Go to latest release

Much migration, but less centralisation

In 2010, following two years of somewhat lower rates of internal migration in 2008 and 2009, the migration was again back at the level of 2007. However, in spite of much migration, the rate of centralisation is decreasing.

Internal net in-migration by centrality

During 2010 there were 214 700 migrations between Norwegian municipalities, which is the highest number ever registered. Adjusted for the size of the population, the mobility was higher until the mid 1970s, and was also higher for a couple of years in the middle of the 1980s and then again in 2000 and 2001. In addition to the high level of migration between municipalities, there were 408 700 migrations within municipalities, which is the highest number ever recorded.

The currents of migrations run between all parts of the country. The net effect of the migrations is a more centralised settlement pattern year by year, also in 2010. There are more people moving to the Oslo region and the other major city regions than in the opposite direction, and the northern and western parts of the country have a population loss every year, while the counties by the Oslo fjord have a net population gain.

Less centralisation

Even though the mobility is high, the rate of centralisation is slowing down for the fourth year in a row (figure 1). Not since the beginning of the 1990s has centralisation been slower. However, back then there was also less migration due to the bank crisis and a downward economic trend. Lately the centralisation has diminished in spite of an upward economic trend and high mobility.

The 10 municipalities with lowest internal net in-migration
 
  Municipality        Per 1 000 mean
population
             Municipality                     Number
 
1 Berg -26   1 Sunndal -118
2 Hornindal -28   2 Bamble -124
3 Dovre -29   3 Førde -137
4 Gamvik -29   4 Vefsn -156
5 Måsøy -31   5 Tromsø -175
6 Verran -32   6 Flora -184
7 Utsira -32   7 Narvik -227
8 Salangen -33   8 Bergen -400
9 Fosnes -35   9 Stavanger -723
10 Vang -35   10 Oslo -966
 
The 10 municipalities with highest internal net in-migration
 
  Municipality Per 1 000 mean
population
             Municipality                     Number
 
1 Modalen 34   1 Ullensaker  498
2 Iveland 25   2 Fredrikstad  497
3 Vevelstad 23   3 Bærum  373
4 Skodje 20   4 Sarpsborg  363
5 Hvaler 18   5 Halden  328
6 Rennesøy 17   6 Skedsmo  318
7 Unjárga Nesseby 17   7 Os (Hordaland)  260
8 Ullensaker 17   8 Askøy  259
9 Bjerkreim 16   9 Eidsvoll  258
10 Os (Hordaland) 15   10 Ski  255
 

Tables