A-Z I Help I Contact I Norwegian
Published: 26.10.2009
Taxes
From Data to Levy Design - The Five Stages of Implementing
Taxes on housing consumption have attractive features. They can enhance overall efficiency, function as automatic stabilizers, and work progressively. Implementation, however, requires a careful balance between economic ambition and political reality. A Discussion Paper by Erling Rĝed Larsen suggests a 5-stage procedure.

Discussion Papers 596 - Statistics Norway, October 2009

Erling Røed Larsen

From data to levy design. The five stages of implementing housing taxes

Abstract:
Taxes on housing consumption have attractive features. They can enhance overall efficiency, function as automatic stabilizers, and work progressively. Implementation, however, requires a careful balance between economic ambition and political reality. This article suggests a 5-stage procedure: identification; estimation; data acquisition and combination; empirical investigation; and tax function construction. It illustrates how to implement by employing the rental-equivalence principle to estimate recent values of owner-occupied housing consumption in a cross-section of Norwegian households by imputing rent for owners based on observed rents in rental markets. It analyzes the distribution of imputed rent over the income range, and demonstrates that imputed rent is a necessary good. A simple tax scheme on real households in a dataset from 2006, shows how a housing tax can be structured with attractive features. Such a tax scheme would, in contrast to the current interest payment subsidy, work counter-cyclically and could, if used as a substitute for income taxes, reduce deadweight losses from labor income taxes. In its suggested form, it would generate approximately 12 billion NOK in revenue for Norway.

Keywords: automatic stabilization, deadweight loss, distribution, efficiency, housing taxation, imputed rent, progressive levy, rental equivalence

JEL classification: C14, C21, D12, D63, H23

Acknowledgement: I am grateful for financial support provided by the Research Council of Norway, project no. 187392/S20 I would also like to thank Erik Biørn, Ådne Cappelen, and Vidar Christiansen for reading earlier drafts of this paper and offering useful and enlightening comments. I have also benefited from ideas put forward by participants at the Bergen Tax Conference, June 910 2009; at the ENHR Conference in Prague 29 June 1 July 2009; and a seminar at the Norwegian Finance Ministry. I am especially indebted to Richard Blundell, Brita Bye, Hans Henrik Scheel, and Morten Skak for penetrating observations.

Address:
Erling Røed Larsen, Statistics Norway, Research Department. E-mail: erling.roed.larsen@ssb.no

Download publication in fulltext:

  • dp596.pdf Publication in Adobe Acrobat format

Home || Search || Comments? || Order || Library || E-mail
Research field
Contact