Waste increasing at the same rate as GDP

Published:

The total amount of waste generated in Norway in 2015 was 11.1 million tonnes, an increase of 3 per cent from 2014. As a result of new updated figures for waste from the manufacturing industry, the total amount of waste in Norway is somewhat smaller than previously calculated, but the increase is more similar to the growth in GDP.

Waste amounts have been recalculated for the years 2012 to 2014. The new figures show a small but steady increase in waste over the last few years. The increase from 2014 to 2015 was three per cent. At the same time, the value added measured by GDP (constant prices) increased by two per cent from 2014 to 2015.

Figure 1. Trends in waste and GDP (constant prices)

GDP (1995=1) Waste (1995=1)¹
1995 1.00 1
1996 1.05 1.01
1997 1.11 1.04
1998 1.13 1.10
1999 1.16 1.12
2000 1.19 1.15
2001 1.22 1.17
2002 1.24 1.19
2003 1.25 1.23
2004 1.30 1.25
2005 1.33 1.32
2006 1.36 1.37
2007 1.40 1.43
2008 1.41 1.43
2009 1.39 1.30
2010 1.40 1.33
2011 1.41 1.39
2012 1.45 1.48
2013 1.46 1.48
2014 1.49 1.51
2015 1.52 1.56

The recovered fraction has decreased

In 2015, the total recovery of non-hazardous waste undergoing known treatment was 77 per cent; a decrease of one per cent from 2014 and three per cent from 2012. This corresponds to 7.4 million tonnes. In 2014, 28 per cent of non-hazardous waste undergoing known treatment was energy recovered, while 36 per cent was subject to material recovery.

The waste amounts undergoing material recovery and incineration are similar. A total of 3.6 million tonnes of waste material was recovered in 2015, while 3.7 million tonnes was incinerated. While asphalt, followed by metals and paper and cardboard constitute the largest fractions for material recovery, mixed waste followed by wood waste still constitute the largest fractions for incineration.

The amounts of waste going to landfill have also increased in the last two years. In 2014, around 13 per cent of non-hazardous waste undergoing known treatment was deposited and in 2015 12 per cent was deposited. This is a slight increase from 11 and 10 per cent in 2012 and 2013 respectively. The largest ordinary waste type being deposited is cinders, dust, bottom ash and fly ash. The largest deposited fraction is hazardous waste.

Figure 2. Non-hazardous waste in Norway, by method of treatment¹. 1995 - 2015. Per cent of known handling

Recycling and biological treatment Incineration Filling compound and cover material² Landfill Other
1995 39.0 22.3 5.3 33.4 0.0
1996 38.5 21.6 7.0 32.9 0.0
1997 38.2 21.0 8.2 32.6 0.0
1998 39.1 21.4 9.4 30.2 0.0
1999 40.6 23.5 7.7 28.3 0.0
2000 42.8 25.5 5.6 26.1 0.0
2001 43.9 27.0 3.8 25.2 0.0
2002 44.9 29.4 2.1 23.6 0.0
2003 45.2 29.2 3.3 22.3 0.0
2004 44.8 31.8 3.1 20.3 0.0
2005 45.7 32.1 6.2 16.1 0.0
2006 46.1 31.8 4.9 17.1 0.0
2007 46.7 32.7 4.2 16.5 0.0
2008 49.0 34.4 3.9 12.6 0.0
2009 48.2 37.6 3.3 11.0 0.0
2010 48.2 37.6 3.3 11.0 0.0
2011 50.6 41.4 2.6 5.4 0
2012 42.5 38.6 7.3 10.8 1.4
2013 43.4 37.4 8.0 9.9 1.3
2014 46.3 34.5 5.0 12.5 1.8
2015 42.0 35.4 7.6 12.3 2.8

Most mixed waste

The major waste material categories in 2015 were mixed waste, which had 25 per cent of the total, followed by hazardous waste with 13 per cent, and other materials (mainly asphalt) with 12 per cent. These same three categories of waste have topped the list since 2012. Wood waste used to be among the three largest waste fractions, but due to a redefinition of large amounts of production waste to by-products, the amounts of wood waste decreased to just 7 per cent of the total waste amounts in 2015.

Figure 3. Waste by type, per cent

Per cent
Wetorganic waste 4 % 4
Plastics 2 % 2
Wood Waste 7 % 7
Sludge 2 % 2
Paper and cardboard 7 % 7
Metals 7 % 7
Concrete and tiles 8 % 8
Cinders, dust, bottom ash and fly Ash 6 % 6
Discarded vehicles 2 % 2
Hazardous waste 13 % 13
Mixed Waste 25 % 25
Other 16 % 16

Manufacturing no longer biggest producer of waste

The manufacturing industry used to generate the most waste of all industries. However, the waste figures in the manufacturing industry have changed considerably. The definition of by-product has been applied to the figures since 2012, which means that the figures are not comparable before and after the definition was introduced.

In 2015, the construction and demolition industry (23 per cent), followed by households (22 per cent) and the service industry (21 per cent) produced the most waste. Waste in the construction and demolition sector and the service sector has been increasing since 2012, while the amount of waste generated by private households has remained similar.

Figure 4. Waste in Norway by source¹

Manufacturing Construction Service Industries Households Other or unspecified
1995 3047 897 824 1250 1082
1996 2985 924 881 1386 995
1997 3083 949 936 1316 1095
1998 3172 1086 999 1448 1100
1999 3241 1098 1042 1493 1096
2000 3249 1162 1105 1546 1113
2001 3174 1279 1155 1602 1087
2002 3101 1361 1182 1715 1098
2003 3190 1395 1215 1770 1167
2004 3195 1429 1310 1852 1117
2005 3066 1694 1383 1944 1296
2006 3062 1592 1486 2042 1514
2007 3127 1905 1517 2132 1482
2008 2919 1927 1618 2184 1505
2009 2579 1705 1329 2135 1458
2010 2657 1544 1366 2187 1699
2011 2674 1608 1439 2293 1875
2012 2638 1884 1958 2476 2243
2013 1441 2285 2151 2441 2177
2014 1528 2496 2161 2443 2098
2015 1434 2581 2318 2457 2261

Masses for landfilling and cover materials

The amounts of slightly polluted soil that were deposited also increased from 2014 to 2015. In 2015, 1.7 million tonnes were sent to ordinary landfills and 230 000 tonnes were used as cover material. This is an increase compared to 2013 and 2014, but a small decrease compared to 2012 when a total of 2.0 million tonnes was deposited or used as cover materials.

Recalculation of figures from 2012 to 2014

Since the last waste account publication, Statistics Norway has published new figures on waste from the manufacturing industry. The new figures were vastly different to the old ones. At the same time, the waste account has been under steady development since the publication of the new waste account for the year 2012. In order to make the figures more comparable, all the figures from 2012 to 2014 have been recalculated to incorporate the latest development and changes in method. Figures between 2012 and 2015 are now comparable.

Contact